Judges should be above reproach, not above accountability. Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales pays lip service to "scrutiny" for judges, but then says "...the notion of bringing judges before Congress like a schoolchild being brought before the principal to me is a little bit troubling." This quote illustrates how judges have been exalted beyond measure. Individuals are routinely called before Congress without regard to their rank or position, be they administration officials, bureaucrats, CEOs of corporations, or private citizens. Does that imply that they are "schoolchildren?" Are judges are free to hand down ludicrous rulings with impunity because they are really the "adults?" No wonder the judiciary has a reputation for elitism.
In more than 225 years, only 14 judges have been impeached by the House. Does this record indicate we are on the verge of a judicial massacre if rogue judges are called to account for certain decisions? Is the "separation of powers" a one-way mirror with the judiciary on one side and the Executive and Legislative Branch on the other? Once a judge passes through the veil of confirmation, has he joined an exclusive club making Oz-like pronouncements from behind the mysterious curtain?
Certainly unseating a judge should not be easy. Indeed, we recently witnessed how difficult it is to impeach a president who had not only lied on live TV to the American people, but also under oath in court. The bar is set high, as it should be for an irrevocable penalty like impeachment. But the power of the judiciary has unarguably ballooned since the Constitution was ratified. Only those who prefer the unaccountable force of the judiciary to accomplish their political or societal goals could object to steps to restore equilibrium to the power wielded by our three branches of government.
In more than 225 years, only 14 judges have been impeached by the House. Does this record indicate we are on the verge of a judicial massacre if rogue judges are called to account for certain decisions? Is the "separation of powers" a one-way mirror with the judiciary on one side and the Executive and Legislative Branch on the other? Once a judge passes through the veil of confirmation, has he joined an exclusive club making Oz-like pronouncements from behind the mysterious curtain?
Certainly unseating a judge should not be easy. Indeed, we recently witnessed how difficult it is to impeach a president who had not only lied on live TV to the American people, but also under oath in court. The bar is set high, as it should be for an irrevocable penalty like impeachment. But the power of the judiciary has unarguably ballooned since the Constitution was ratified. Only those who prefer the unaccountable force of the judiciary to accomplish their political or societal goals could object to steps to restore equilibrium to the power wielded by our three branches of government.
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.