U.S. Cosponsors U.N. Resolution to Fight Texting and Driving

    While crises continue in Ukraine, Syria, Iran, and the Central African Republic, the United Nations turned its attention to a different kind of crisis on Thursday: the "global road safety crisis."  The U.N. General Assembly held a session on Improving Global Road Safety in which the United States cosponsored a resolution "which calls for laws to fight texting and driving."  Ambassador Samantha Power tweeted the following:

Proud to cosponsor UN Resolution on #RoadSafety, which calls for laws to fight texting and driving. My remarks: http://t.co/XKQTH3vjz2
— Samantha Power (@AmbassadorPower) April 10, 2014

    In her remarks at the session, Power noted that although "improvements in road design, traffic management, safety equipment, and emergency response" could help reduce the 1.2 million annual worldwide traffic fatalities, "[m]ost important, however, is driver behavior." She continued:

Excessive speed and a failure to obey traffic rules are both killers. The role of alcohol in traffic fatalities is also well documented and should never be understated. In recent years, however, we have faced a new and deadly threat in the form of driving while texting or talking on the phone. Research shows that cell phone users are over 5 times more likely to get in an accident than undistracted drivers. And that texting while driving can delay a driver’s reactions as much as a 0.08 blood-alcohol level, the same as a drunk driver. Already, in the United States, more teenagers are killed while texting than because they have been drinking. But the problem is neither confined to teenagers nor to highly-industrialized countries; it is spreading as fast as technology.

    It is unclear how the push for such bans will fare, particularly in less developed countries where drivers routinely take shortcuts on sidewalks, and red lights and stop signs often seem optional. However, Power cited a new law just passed in Maryland that was named for Jake Owen, a five-year-old who was killed when a distracted driver rammed the boy's family's car.  The law increases penalties for drivers found responsible for causing an accident while talking on a cell phone or texting.


Note: A version of this post first appeared at The Weekly Standard.

Where is the White House Atrocities Prevention Board?

    As the debate rages about chemical weapons use in Syria and the 1,400 victims the August 21 attack alone apparently claimed, where is President Obama's Atrocities Prevention Board (APB)?  A Study Directive issued by the president on August 4, 2011, said that an interagency review should be carried out so that "the Atrocities Prevention Board can commence its work within 120 days," which would have been early December 2011.
    In reality, the president announced the first meeting of the board on April 23, 2012, after more than double the 120 days had passed.  President Obama spoke at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, and even devoted three paragraphs of the speech specifically to the situation in Syria.  In part, he said:

Now we’re doing something more.  We’re making sure that the United States government has the structures, the mechanisms to better prevent and respond to mass atrocities.  So I created the first-ever White House position dedicated to this task.  It’s why I created a new Atrocities Prevention Board, to bring together senior officials from across our government to focus on this critical mission.  This is not an afterthought.  This is not a sideline in our foreign policy.  The board will convene for the first time today, at the White House.  And I’m pleased that one of its first acts will be to meet with some of your organizations -- citizens and activists who are partners in this work, who have been carrying this torch... 

I’ve signed an executive order that authorizes new sanctions against the Syrian government and Iran and those that abet them for using technologies to monitor and track and target citizens for violence.  These technologies should not empower -- these technologies should be in place to empower citizens, not to repress them.  And it’s one more step that we can take toward the day that we know will come -- the end of the Assad regime that has brutalized the Syrian people -- and allow the Syrian people to chart their own destiny.

    The meeting the president referenced in his speech was held the same day at the White House and largely consisted of three panel discussions with various government officials and human rights organization figures.  Prior to those discussions, the following appears on the agenda for the meeting:

Discussion with the Atrocities Prevention Board 

Moderator: Samantha Power, Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights at the National Security Council

    However, it is unclear who is actually on the board.  The APB does not appear to have its own website, office, or contact information, either on the White House website or elsewhere.  Very little has been heard from the board since its creation, and barely a month after its launch, the following exchange took place at a White House press briefing:

Q    Jay, thanks.  Two questions.  Starting with Syria, has the President’s new Atrocities Prevention Board met to consider a response to the Syrian crisis, particularly since the Houla massacre?

MR. CARNEY:  I’m sorry, has the --

Q    The President’s new Atrocities Prevention Board, which he actually announced at the Holocaust visit, has it met?

MR. CARNEY:  I’ll have to take the question.  I don’t know the answer to that.

    The White House press secretary did not even seem to have been aware of the initially meeting, and certainly not about any subsequent meeting.   The last reference to the APB by the White House came nearly a year after the April 2012 launch in a May 1, 2013, blog post on the White House website with an accompanying Fact Sheet.  The blog entry said:

At the President’s direction, we have stood up an interagency Atrocities Prevention Board, which monitors emerging threats, focuses U.S. Government efforts, and develops new tools and capabilities.

    The Fact Sheet provided some more details about the APB, but mostly in broad terms.  Individual board members are not named, and the times and places of its meetings are not revealed:

o The Board includes senior representatives of the Departments of State, Defense, Treasury, Justice (DOJ), and Homeland Security (DHS), the Joint Staff, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.S. Mission to the United Nations, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Office of the Vice President and the National Security Staff.
o The Board identifies and addresses emerging atrocity threats, by scanning the horizon for critical developments, assessing the risk of mass atrocities in particular situations, and supplementing existing efforts, or catalyzing new efforts, to ensure that atrocity threats receive adequate and timely attention.
o The Board also coordinates the development of new policies and tools, including many listed below, to enhance the capacity of the United States to effectively prevent and respond to atrocities. 

    The only individual whose name has been linked directly with the board is Samantha Power, who served on the National Security Council until President Obama nominated her to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.  Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) noted during her confirmation hearings Ms. Power's "role as the head of President Obama’s Atrocities Prevention Board."
    Now that Ms. Power has moved to her new position, it is unclear who chairs the APB if indeed the board still meets.  The ongoing crisis in Syria would seem to be an ideal time for the public to hear from the board or for the president to announce new leadership to deal with the crisis.  Perhaps, given the current state of affairs, he's more than willing to simply allow the board's existence to fade into the background.

State Department Refers Questions About Ambassador Power ... to U.N.

    Newly confirmed United Nations Ambassador [Samantha] Power's absence from an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council on the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria has raised eyebrows and questions.  When pressed on the matter at Thursday's press briefing, State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki three times declined to give further details on Power's whereabout and referred further questions to the United Nations:

QUESTION: Last question: Where exactly was Ambassador Power that she could not take part in this emergency Security Council session?
MS. PSAKI: Well --
QUESTION: Where exactly was she?
MS. PSAKI: Well, I think the UN has spoken to this, but since you asked and I like to be transparent as possible, Ambassador Power is on a prearranged trip...
QUESTION: Is she on vacation?
MS. PSAKI: I don’t have any more details for you. I’d send you to the UN for her schedule.

 * * * * * *

QUESTION: I just don’t understand why you’re unwilling to tell us where Ambassador Power was. There’s no dishonor in having had a scheduled vacation, if that’s the case.
MS. PSAKI: She had a previously scheduled trip.
QUESTION: Where?
MS. PSAKI: I don’t think I need to go into more detail from here, and you’re welcome to call the United Nations, where she is the Ambassador.

    However, each usage of "UN" by Ms. Psaki was later footnoted in the State Department transcript as "U.S. Mission to the UN."  And as the State Department's organizational chart shows, the U.S. Mission to the UN is part of the State Department, directly under the secretary of state.

    Jen Psaki is the spokesperson for the State Department.


Note: A version of this article first appeared at The Weekly Standard.