FACEbook

Showing posts with label Abraham Lincoln. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abraham Lincoln. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

White House Condolence Form Letter in Use Since 2009 [Updated]

    Just weeks after Barack Obama was inaugurated, the following story appeared in the New York Daily News:
WASHINGTON - President Obama has adopted role model Abraham Lincoln's practice of writing deeply personal letters to the families of troops killed in battle. He signs them "Barack." 
Bill Brennan, the father of Marine Lance Cpl. Julian Brennan, said at first he barely glanced at the letter he had received last week. 
"I assumed it was a form letter and then I saw that he had signed it - just 'Barack.' You could tell it wasn't a stamped signature. I was so surprised he signed it with only his first name. We were very touched," the Brooklyn dad said Tuesday.
Without disclosing the details of the letter, Brennan said, "It had some personal mentions about Julian's history. I was inspired to respond." 
An aspiring actor, Julian Brennan, 25, was killed by a land mine Jan. 24, the first U.S. combat death in Afghanistan during Obama's presidency.
Obama has since written to the families of about a dozen troops killed in Afghanistan and Iraq. He handwrites the notes, has an aide type them up and then signs the version to be delivered to loved ones.
Now that his first term in office is nearing its end, it appears that practice may have been short-lived.  A story recently appeared on the website Click2Houston.com describing the disappointment expressed by the father of a recently killed Marine over the letter of condolence received from the president:
A man who lost a son to the war in Afghanistan is disappointed in the condolence letter he received from President Barack Obama.
Tom Logan, a Willis resident, calls the note late, impersonal, disrespectful and essentially a form letter.
"It opened up a wound in our heart you can't fix. You can't send another letter. You can't make it right," Logan said.
Logan's son, USMC Cpl. Joseph D. Logan, was killed Jan. 19, 2012, along with five other men when the helicopter they were in crashed.
Joey Logan was 22.
The story links to two letters to families of other service members (here and here) also killed in action.  I have reproduced the body of each letter below:
Letter #1, May 9, 2012

Letter #2, May 9, 2012
Around the end of August, a story appeared, first at the Gateway Pundit, about nearly identical letters received by a numbers of families of service members killed in August 2011.  At the time, there was suspicion that the letters were signed by a machine, but my analysis dispelled that accusation.  However, the letters themselves were indeed form letters just like the May 9, 2012 letters above.

Letter #1, September 23, 2011
Letters #2-#4, September 23, 2011 
Letters #5-#7, September 23, 2011
The latter two images are more difficult to make out, but as far as I can determine, the wording of the final two paragraphs is virtually identical to the others letters above.

    In February 2011, an article appeared on the Austin, TX, Statesmen.com website honoring Marine Cpl. Tevan Nguyen of Hutto, killed in Afghanistan on Dec. 28, 2010.  Although an image of the letter is not provided, the article contains the following quote:
"A simple letter cannot ease the pain of losing a child, but I hope you take solace in knowing that his brave service exceeded all measures of selflessness and devotion to his country," President Barack Obama wrote.
This sentence, of course, comes from the now familiar middle paragraph present in all the other letters above.

    Finally, in November 2009, a long overdue letter from the White House came to the family of Gregg Wenzel, a CIA operative killed in Ethiopia in July 2003.  His family posted the letter online at a site set up to honor this man.  Here we find what may be the prototype for the letter the White House continued to send to grieving families for at least the next two and a half years:

Letter, November 2, 2009

    With more than 1,500 service members killed in Afghanistan since Barack Obama became president, as well as others (such as Wenzel the CIA operative) who have died in the line of duty, the above represents a very small sample of the condolence letters that have gone out from the White House in the last four years.  (President Obama even changed the White House condolence letter policy to include service members who commit suicide while deployed in a combat zone.)  However, I can find no examples of condolence letters that do not fit the pattern of those I have presented here.  If any are brought to my attention, I will gladly link to them.

    The President may have entered office trying to emulate Abraham Lincoln, but soon surrendered to the less labor-intensive and less personal form letter.  For those whose family members have made the ultimate sacrifice for their country, such a letter from the Commander in Chief must be cold comfort.  A President whose campaign currently offers 23 different eCards (topics ranging from the repeal of DADT to the end of the war in Iraq to women's rights) should have found the time to ease the pain of these families with a bit more of a human touch.

UPDATE: I noticed that Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit actually posted a similar story yesterday around 12:15, about half a day before my story was posted. [I moved this update to the bottom of this post in October of 2017.]

Friday, May 11, 2012

Log Cabin Democrats

    One gets the sense from the Obama campaign's response to the President's announcement regarding same-sex marriage that the whole thing was like a surprise party gone wrong.  Preparations have been under way behind the scenes for months, perhaps years; the President has on more than one occasion issued unequivocal support for traditional marriage; then at other times, he gave hints that perhaps something was afoot.  But on Sunday, Joe Biden leaned too heavily on the closet door and came stumbling out into the living room.  Surprise!
    Whether or not Biden's slip was part of the plan (a matter of some debate,) within hours if not minutes of the President's interview with ABC's Robin Roberts, the Obama campaign began to release a torrent of tweets on their Twitter account, blog entries on barackobama.com, fund raising emails, and even YouTube videos proclaiming the end of Evolution - the President had arrived at the highest form of same-sex marriage positions.
    But has he?  Even though the President's supporters let fly with a million dollars in new campaign contributions almost overnight, many commentators on both sides of the political divide are unconvinced.  Rush Limbaugh spent a good deal of time on his show Thursday explaining that nothing has changed.  Everyone already knew President Obama supported same-sex marriage anyway, and his announcement on Wednesday was nothing more than rhetoric - his administration has committed to no actions to bring about the end goal.  He wants to leave the decision "up to the states," which is in itself problematic given his administration's stand on the Defense of Marriage Act.  The President's supporters are certainly used to empty rhetoric by now, but the "historic" nature of the moment seemed to have once again trumped the less promising reality.  It is even likely the President timed his coming out to follow the drubbing same-sex marriage took in North Carolina in order to capitalize on the fury its supporters felt.  The lower the low, the higher the high.
    But once the euphoria wears off, how will the President's followers view what the President himself was quick to cast as "history" being made?  It has occurred to me Obama’s gay marriage stance sounds an awful lot like Lincoln’s oft criticized letter to Horace "Go West, Young Man" Greeley.  President Lincoln wrote to Greeley in an effort to explain that as President, saving the Union took precedence over all other considerations, including slavery, regardless of his personal feelings.  Critics have tried to paint Lincoln as weak on slavery based on this letter despite the fact that soon after he wrote the letter, he signed the Emancipation Proclamation freeing the slaves and paid for it with his life a few short years later.
    The modern LGBTers see themselves as the modern day slaves, oppressed by society much like blacks in the days of Lincoln.  Frankly, I find the equivalence repugnant and silly, but for purposes of comparison, let's see what the President was really saying in his announcement on Wednesday.  With apologies to Abraham Lincoln, I have slightly altered the wording of his letter (Lincoln's original words are italicized) to fit the current controversy in which President Obama finds himself enmeshed:
As to the policy I "seem to be pursuing" as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.  If I could save my presidency without gay marriage I would do it, and if I could save it by gay marriage I would do it; and if I could save it by allowing some gays to marry and some to not marry I would also do that. What I do about gay marriage, and LBGT people, I do because I believe it helps to save my presidency; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save my presidency. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views.
I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty; and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men and women every where could marry whichever sex they choose.
President Obama's supporters have often characterized him as a modern-day Lincoln.  On Wednesday, he played that role, but in their interpretation of Lincoln, in the least admirable way.  As it becomes clear in the coming months that the president will issue no Emancipation Proclamation of his own, perhaps those supporters will recognize the hard truth that while both Lincoln and Obama hail from Illinois, the current president is just another Chicago politician after all.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

"History" in Perspective

A speech to the troops before battle - August 26, 1776


Gettysburg Address - November 19, 1863


A tweet - May 9, 2012